Tuesday, March 12, 2013
Reading Response to Scribe's "The Glass of Water"
Despite
the various characters and plot points competing for attention in Eugene Scribe’s
The Glass of Water, one character in
particular stands out as the protagonist to me. Without the careful plotting
and planning of Bolingbroke, the events of the play would not occur since it is
he who drives the action forward time and time again despite the attempts made
by the Duchess to thwart his political plans. It is Bolingbroke, driven by his
desire to gain political power in the Queen’s court, who brings the French
ambassador to St. James Place and who helps Abigail to obtain a position in the
court so that she can make a living. While it is clear that Scribe wants the
audience to “root for” Masham and Abigail (the audience is sympathetic to their
romance), these two lovebirds would never have been able to be united in
matrimony had it not been for Bolingbroke’s intervention. Whether or not he
does this out of the kindness of his heart is another matter entirely. He knows
that the union of the lovers will infuriate the Duchess, his sworn rival and
equal in political intrigue, so he could very well be acting in a beneficent
manner simply for his own pleasure at seeing the Duchess scorned. Without
Bolingbroke, there would be no play at all. Or, at least, it would be an
entirely different story. Even the secret of the glass of water would not have
been revealed had Bolingbroke not so carefully intervened so as to spite the
Duchess once more. He also brings about the play’s happy ending by freeing
Masham from incarceration, uniting the two lovers, and giving the French envoy
an audience with the Queen, thus fulfilling all of his political desires.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
3 comments:
I like your view on the reasoning of uniting Abigail and Masham. It didn't occur to me that would be his force behind bringing two people together. Cynicalish motive, but a good one when it comes to outright wining a war.
Okay so I definitely see where you're coming from. I'm one of those kiddos that mainly focused on the love aspect of the plot, because that's what grabs my attention. Whereas the politics behind everything sort of bored me. I like that you thought of it from the opposite perspective as me. Well thought out, Labrador.
After reading both yours and cory's posts i'm almost beginning to lean toward team Bolingbroke. However! My main 'hang up' is that the plot of the play revolves more around the goals of Abigail and Masham. Although Bolingbroke achieves his goal as well, it would have been a completely different play had it focused on the politics and war portion of the story. For that reason alone, I think Bolingbroke can not be the protagonist. His goal is not the main goal and he is not who we root for.
Post a Comment